About the documentation LEGAL Uruguayan Carlos Gardel, we can say that is not the first time researchers from the French line, alter the content of documents to make them match their views.
In an effort to "prove" that the only official documentation of Carlos Gardel was false, manipulate information to suit their desires .
Mr. Stephen in the book "Carlos Gardel, French history" , pg. 248, has altered not only the order of the articles -which of course has a sequence logic, but has given the words a fanciful interpretation. The note
where playing:
"Articles of the Law 3028, 3030 of 21 March 1906 and its regulations 17/1/1917.Capítulos II and III." the order of the articles has been deliberately altered in order.
The order in which the author lists articles 1), 2), 3), 4) belies the numbers they are: 85. 86. 84. 89.
all know that if we alter the order of items that are correlated also changing interpretations can be given to them.
This same man, who does not know that # 84 above at # 85 and the same is followed by the number 86, who seeks to undermine with daubs mathematical veracity indisputably a photograph showing Carlos Gardel child in a school in Montevideo.
copy the same as contained in the book Collection of Laws and Decrees, Volume 40 of the Law: Article 84
. Son of nationality documents duly authenticated testimony in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, birth or marriage from the Register of Civil Status and Parish Registers with note the direction of Status (Act shipments of parts Parish July 7, 1888).
are also documents of the national public appointments can only be filled by citizens of the Republic ballots Civic Registration, certificates of registration in another consulate, or any other authentic document issued by the authorities Republic, where he put on the quality of natural or legal citizen of which is provided to register.
Article 85. Consular agents will not refuse citizenship certificates to those who lack the documents mentioned in previous article, this desirable as citizens of the Republic by two credible witnesses, national, if possible.
Article 86. The registration certificate from the register shall be signed by registered, if you knew it, and also by two witnesses in the case of the preceding article.
person shall be given a registration certificate, valid for one year, in the formula numbered allocated for this purpose the Ministry (Model No. 9).
Article 89. Consular agents acting as Officers of the Civil Status Registry will Matrix, in duplicate, and included in the births, marriages and deaths of citizens of the Republic, which occurred in territory under its jurisdiction (model numbers 10, 11 and 12). The register and registration shall be as prescribed in the decree-law of January 11, 1879, chapters I and II, and resolution of August 16, 1887, as the wording is concerned.
What reasonable conclusion can be expected of one who places the items 85 86 and before the article 84, when the article BACK , ie 85 , is precisely the one that says not refuse him the certificates to those who DO NOT HAVE THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS.
It was a law that attempted to address the problems of undocumented Carlos Gardel.
Mr. Stephen thinks he knows more about Uruguayan regulations that lawyers and notaries in the country, who reaffirmed the legitimacy of the documentation Uruguayan Carlos Gardel. What titles
credited this man to justify his pedantry and allow you to disqualify recognized professional?
With his attitude, it just shows ignorance or bad faith. -------------------------------------------
Legitimacy Gardel official documentation
The book THE CAR-GAR-DEL, Freddy González Araujo scribe (*), reaffirms the legitimacy of the documentation of the singer Carlos Gardel, Uruguayan-born and naturalized Argentine Tacuarembó issued by the Consul of the Republic of Uruguay in the City of Buenos Aires - Argentina, the October 8, 1920, pursuant to the provisions of the 3030 Law on Organization of the Consular Corps of the Republic.
Arezzo Dr. Carlos Posada, lawyer, president of the Foundation Carlos Gardel, in the foreword of the book, after saying that its author, for being a notary, has been developing a legal court's reasoning, make an honest analysis and manage a healthy approach the interpretation of public and private documents of Gardel adds:
" appreciate this aspect, as used seriously confronted with arguments convoluted and distorted, like the one used by authors of the official thesis. "A clear example of that insistent and disqualified interpretation, comes back from a recent book: " Carlos Gardel, French background, where the authors (Ruffian, Stephen and Gallop) try to make a provisional nature of nationality registration Gardel, 1920, the Uruguayan Consulate in Buenos Aires, playing in the wrong way a provision of the Decree of Law No. 3030, expressly confusing for enabling standard for the registration of nationality, to the certificate that was issued to justify such registration .- "
(*) Freddy González Araujo
Among his many positions he held the Vice President of the Society of Notaries of the Uruguay. His impeccable personal and professional, supporting its suitability in the subject tratado.Actualmente chairs the "Historical Association of Las Piedras, March 8, 1744 and Julio Sosa Foundation and a member of the Executive Committee of the Uruguayan Federation of Tango (FUTANGO)
This note can be also in:
