DOCUMENTATION URUGUAYAN Gardel Carlos Gardel Carlos GARDEL
clerk's new book Freddy González Araujo, reaffirms the legitimacy of the documentation of the singer Carlos Gardel, Uruguayan-born and naturalized Argentine Tacuarembó issued by Consul of the Republic of Uruguay in the City of Buenos Aires - Argentina, on October 8, 1920, pursuant to the provisions of the 3030 Law on Organization of the Consular Corps of the Republic.
Among his many positions he held the Vice President of the Society of Notaries of the Uruguay. His impeccable personal and professional, support your expertise in the subject. He currently chairs the Association Historic Las Piedras, March 8, 1744 and Julio Sosa Foundation and includes the Executive Committee of the Uruguayan Federation of Tango (FUTANGO) Dr. Carlos Arezzo Posada, lawyer, president of the Foundation Carlos Gardel in the prologue the book, after saying that its author, for being a notary, has been developing a legal court's reasoning, make an honest analysis and manage a healthy approach the interpretation of public and private documents of the star, adding:
" We value this aspect, as used confronts the seriousness fetched and distorted reasoning, as employed by authors of the official thesis. "A clear example of that insistent and disqualified interpretation, comes back from a recent book:" Carlos Gardel, French background, where the authors (Ruffian, Stephen and Gallop) try to give provisional character of national registration Gardel, 1920, the Uruguayan Consulate in Buenos Aires, playing in the wrong way a provision of the Decree of Law No. 3030, confusing to expressly rule enabling the registration of nationality, with the certificate they issued to justify such registration .- "
can be seen in the book an analysis of ownership document signed before the notary Busch Buero in the city of Montevideo, for the purpose of writing the three plots of land, located in Carrasco near the resort where the buyer stated that his full name was Carlos Gardel and so I define and Bonapelch Armando testified. It also makes an analysis of the holographic will, making clear that the probate NOT ISSUE ON THE CONTENT OF THIS DOCUMENT AND ANY WAY Validates what it provides,
only gives matrix, so it is well copyrighted and protected by issuing the clerk a witness that is what people use in general, so that if destroyed or lost the evidence, the Clerk may issue other because it has the original (parent) in its register of protocol.
0 comments:
Post a Comment