RESPONSE TO PUBLICATION OF JUAN CARLOS ESTEBAN
Mr . Esteban has a habit of publishing articles accusing obviating send to the recipient. Or think we are all dedicated to surfing the internet night and day searching your notes, do not fear the Answers?. I have sent today, February 5, 2010, from the box gardeloriental@gmail.com responsible Page Carlos Gardel - The ORIENTAL , a note that was sent at the time by Mr. Juan Carlos Esteban, which was published on July 26, 2008 at Gardel Web page, entitled: FAILURE IS A FORM OF LYING , which makes me a victim of his usual insults:
worth noting that that page does not support right to reply.
I answer then, by this means:
I see, Mr. Stephen, who to rely on the "warning" that the Uruguayan authorities did, in the sense that Gardel was the " One issue not yet clarified " should go back to the year 1996 . Seems not to hear about the progress of the investigation.
I remind you that the application of DNA, from Uruguayan authorities needs a political decision, not easy when there are issues between two countries stinging.
However, the CEG, an institution that you are an influential member, only needs a simple appeal , Uruguayan tango that institutions are willing to support, according to the statements. Tell me, reasons why not make ?
is lie that I have persisted in committing the Culture Committee of the House of Representatives of Uruguay with the aim of my study is to analyze the schooling of Carlos Gardel in Montevideo. Why no evidence that I have requested such a thing, or that has ever said he wanted to be quoted or would it be? Please specify, please, without equivocation, or you look like a lie over yours.
All speculations and quackery on the subject have run on their behalf and that of his followers.
You say "This claim is based on the appropriation of a photograph of the artist in childhood, devoid of documented identification. "
First, school photography Gardel is public domain from the time it was published and no law prohibits is analyzed by researchers.
Secondly, the identification of Gardel made the same Berta Gardes, his adoptive mother, and no one questions its authenticity.
Third, a photograph is a document identificatory testimonial and more accurate than birth certificates, licenses or registrations that may have errors or may not belong to anyone who "is said."
going to the "identification document" that you and the CEG present, it would additional value to the identity of the star, if he had belonged, untested version.
now I answer your following points:
a, b) actually says that all such Registrations, Certificates, Forms, Tables, etc., That you mentioned, belonged to Charles Romuald Gardes , natural son of Berta Gardes and, so far, you have not submitted fingerprints have matched the child whose birth certificate says born in Toulouse, or the child who received his schooling in Buenos Aires, so we can not know if the same fingerprints that corresponded to the singer Carlos Gardel.
Nor did they present photographs that show in educational institutions where he studied. The only known, was taken in the courtyard of artisans of the College Pius IX in 1901, when the child Gardes (which was not Gardel) was studying there his 2 nd year of artisans, and is identified by the teacher Carlos Conci , who shared with him and his companions activities over two years of boarding .
The photograph of that child, compared to the oval portrait, in a study conducted by Mr. Horacio Solla, resulted in two children, group photo and the portrait oval have the same anthropological characteristics, which is a further indication of the existence of two children.
however, does not appear photographed the singer Carlos Gardel children among those children who were enrolled in 1901 the 2 nd degree of artisans in the College Pius IX. What reason could be because it believes that Gardel not come out in the picture?
c) My opinion on the date that the photo could be taken is clearly stated in my writings: "The school picture (Carlitos Gardel) could be taken between 23 May 1891, the date when the School No. 27 was moved to the Peach local 337 -, and 1893, "due date Carlos Gardel that have been given to Berta Gardes in Buenos Aires, according to a statement by Mr Matthew Parisi, son of Colonel Carlos Escayola. " http://fotosmartinai.blogspot.com/
Other dates referred to are referred to published history of photography, nothing more.
Again you need the truth to say "I miss" the first publication of this picture was made in 1936.
In the first article published on the schoolhouse Gardel 2004, Carlos Gardel and the school on almost Dunes
Peach http://www.clubdetango.com.ar/gardel/escuelita.htm , say
"In addition to the certificates belonging to Carlos Gardes is another important testimony that shows a child Carlos Gardel, fully identified as such with a circle by Berta Gardes, when would be between 6 and 9 years as part of a school group. This is a photograph was published by the magazine "The Modern Song" on June 6, 1936 . "
She added that Marin was published in 1960 .
his most Another lie is the one that says, "I did mention to Marín disappear." I can not change anything on pages that are not mine.
addition this statement remains on the page mentioned above and also on the page: Schooling Carlos Gardel in Montevideo
information that the photograph was pasted on cardboard I was given Guadalupe Aballe, a researcher who respect his honesty, who also kindly send me the original scan I used for the studies.
Let readers draw their own conclusions .
PS Do not forget Mr. Stephen, who from the November 8, 2007 , I'm hoping you or CEG, present any evidence that school photograph was taken Carlitos Gardel in Buenos Aires.
THE "avoidance maneuvers" DE JUAN CARLOS ESTEBAN
GARDEL schooling in Montevideo, a stinging pain in the ass "official history."
do not forget that so far, neither you nor the CEG have presented no serious study, conducted by the right people, enabling Gardel disqualify the assistance of the schoolhouse and Dunes of Montevideo Durazno.
View:
Carlos Gardel and his Montevideana Escuelita - Absurd rebuttal of Juan Carlos Esteban
Fantasy demonstration of ignorance and irrational to try to discredit the importance of a photographic document testimonial
0 comments:
Post a Comment