Santiago Rosero
mobile cabinets that represent the government develops to decentralize political communication in traditional media as an alternative to the logic of industrial processing of information. That has sometimes resulted in populism and propaganda is true, but it is also true that there is an interest in enabling other broadcast channels (which under the present circumstances is equivalent to more confrontational dialogue) because playing echoes several private media and disinformation campaigns mounted by opposition groups have been able to distort your convenience, the scenario of events since the Republic Ecuador was born. Socialization workshops on the articles of the various laws that are currently struggling (Or hinder) in the National Assembly, which were implemented after the Constituent Montecristi, are another example. In both cases, referrals and efficiency in the results obtained are, in themselves, flour for another mass. A mass as, for discussion bounded to the subject, you may add the role of the media conglomerate that controls the government against the private media set, although the first, yet more interference is installed public opinion.
The purpose of such a bet not only pointed to the opening of spaces in terms of infrastructure, but to consider communication as a possible case the field of face-off between authorities and community interaction-personal communication in the best looking in the worst dialogue and communicating what has been decided and facing the consequences of the lack of socialization processes. In short, it sought to create a platform never before raised by any government to bridge the gap between senders and receivers, and to avoid steps that process the information until the news again with pleasure mixed with more pepper out there and there more aniline. I think that Correa's decision to appear in the Regiment Quito to try to explain the scope of the new Public Service Act due, in part because it considered it possible to manage this way of exercising political communication even in a scenario of disagreement (we now know that by the time of his arrival was more rebellion and fire, and that to catch it early there was no intelligence competent functioning.) Moreover, he did because he got drunk, again, the omnipotence of thought is coated. Looking
the first perspective one can recognize the attachment to a legitimate exercise of politics in terms of communication, and if we recognize the second recklessness, folly, and even provocation. Both may be true, and neither, for that matter, was wise or timely, but also no sufficient to determine that what happened was the result of a mount and so now we should be talking about a self-kidnappings and an inside job. Argue that it is because Correa was to get a purpose in the wolf's mouth is so little as it is that because among the people who were in the Regiment Araujo Quito Fidel walked one can speak of the dark hand of plotting the Patriotic Society assassination. The dark hand of the Patriotic Society may raise suspicion because his political action responds to a logic of revenge and ruin, but neither Fidel Araujo talking on the phone or the chanted "it was Lucio, Lucio that was" sufficient to prove anything. At least not yet. To achieve this, if any, are the investigations that have already begun.
for relying excessively Sea in the capacity of its rhetoric or bully that the President stood in the middle of the riot police, nothing justifies and legitimizes violence unless the members of the Police insurgents were moving the event to disgrace today we all regret. This, it now seems a truism that should serve to overcome if it caused or belt or not if he did little or a lot, and to advance the need to investigate what made it possible to reach such extreme and furtive motives to a few hundred policemen made them get rid of all institutional principle and all human values. That there is no doubt, his eyes overflowing with hatred that barely could see through her shirt improvised masks showed that surpassed his own seeking union unrest claims, and that had already been diverted to a nonsense that was beginning to border on slaughter. The attack on an ambulance with rescue workers and injured people can not bear the slightest hesitation.
After the balance, many members of the police hierarchy for some reason did not participate in the revolt (Franks, sick, travel) also supported it . Several of those that say they did today repentant and many others recognize that they were "brainwashed" and "duped." Little of this has been said through the media. This circulating in the corridors of law enforcement agencies and has floated pricked by a low voice testimony from a police officer known.
One question that seems key is who they were and as elaborated the systematic brainwashing that in a time of slippage, as demonstrated by the audio recording released today, aimed to assassinate the President. The thesis of the coup appears weak when it is recognized that it was impossible for police to insurgents succeed in achieving public support, but considering, as sounds, that a major military faction was routed to the same, the argument does not seem so outlandish. But when nothing was as expected, when some pieces from the board and others claimed they fell unthinkable dimensions, came the fatal outcome whose numbers are increasing. And was generated in extremis , not to say that was developing a script prepared, which almost resulted in an assassination.
On this and much more, for now, the doubts and speculations, but on other emergencies edges and deep thoughts. It is essential to inquire into the concrete, material and intellectual authors of the internal disinformation campaigns which lampoons, printed posters as evidence and testimony are isolated, but with the same resolution is urgent to deepen the symbolic and regulatory guides the work of the institutions of law enforcement. What is the role of police in contemporary society?, What she wants and what should be required?, Where do you direct the policies that try to straighten and strengthen it (in terms of equipment and skills)? what is the role that civil society has played in the development of their functions?, is it to build more police, that "everyone has his gun", or is it to educate and prepare intellectually its members, to make social legitimacy and authority to charge more for their service work order and control through the imposition of brute-force ", is it feared a distorted and perhaps most sinister of the Doctrine of the Homeland Security key ruled undemocratic and damaging to human rights security policies of most Latin American nations during the Cold War era, and that among its main lines of action included the penetration and infiltration of social organizations, monitoring physical and electronic popular leaders, the illegal search of premises, theft of databases and more tricks of persecution and repression at its original program, apparently seeking the protection and defense of the state, is it to think that some tenets of it have reached some form of conversion in the Public Safety system, which in theory is concerned with personal status objective and subjective, to be free of violence or threat of violence or intentional spoliation by others?, have you mixed up, partnerships have rotted and order that marks the Constitution as a result of the intransigence of the Executive and corruption and ignorance of certain bases of law enforcement?
questions fit for all parts of this board on fire. The stitches are for government designing public policies for civil society, which in various forms are approved, are shared and consumed, and, with shame and paradox, for the institutions of order, they are protagonists in this bitter chapter will never forget.
Of course, no answer is possible if this tragedy to life and democracy (which is quite battered) is not part of the executive initiating dialogue, if not making, being as it were, the saddest day of his life, as a final lesson and an opportunity to loosen the ties postponed that make you believe possessor of truths.
This does not, in any way which should ignore the sanctions for those who deserve them, though this can generate other fractures. In a system often frequent cracked one lime and one of sand.
0 comments:
Post a Comment