On Thursday night from ECTV signal witnessed a group of people entered that channel breaking doors and shouting slogans against Rafael Correa. No wonder the crowd to distinguish between Pablo Guerrero, a former lawyer of Lucio Gutiérrez. If I was surprised to see in this group to Dr. Maria Graciela Crespo, director of university connected to Opus Dei, who was with me in recent months in the program So we are talking about euthanasia. At that time I thought a woman extremely peaceful, profoundly Christian, who argued against euthanasia from the principle that life is sacred. What was this lady coming into force and breaking glass? What strikes a rubber with a gutierrismo academic opusdeiana lawyer?
María Alejandra Cevallos, university law student, was chosen from the group of protesters to speak on camera. She said she needed the country found out another truth. That happened in the Shyris Avenue where a large group of people had self-organized to demonstrate against the form of government of Rafael Correa.
Diario El Universo reported on Sunday October 3 on page 9 of the first section makes an interview with Maria Alejandra Molina Santiago Cevallos. The interview seems designed to justify the reasons that led to Cevallos and company to enter the workforce to ECTV. It makes an apology for the young. Courageous woman, a law student, who does not belong to any movement or political party and risked his physical integrity to try to inform the public means people with other truth. Cevallos justified having knocked the door because people said, "when in movement is a little angry." And because it was not fair to mislead the nation and others to silence the media.
Is this journalism? The interview that Sunday in the second section Robalino Cecilia did to Carlos Villagrán "Kiko" was much more critical and questioning it in Santiago Molina Maria Alejandra Cevallos. Never asked Cevallos, how well a student of fourth year of law know that art. 164 and following of the Constitution of Ecuador governing states of emergency? Prior censorship of the media is contained in the articles. It may be that Cevallos not seem fair, but in fact the move was legal and constitutional. Cevallos "did not know that this censorship was based on a decree of emergency? Why was it so important that people know that there were people who during the incident on Thursday took to the streets shouting slogans against the regime? Does this justify violence? Could not this incursion into ECTV have aggravated the situation? Would not that just be trying, through this chain of media prevent more people like Cevallos, Crespo or Guerrero came out to break windows and doors to express their views? "This is another truth that he wanted to spread Cevallos did well in the country? How? Cevallos said he did not represent any movement or political group and Santiago Molina was so hot dog. Why did not inquire more about Molina Cevallos? Did it suddenly occurred to this young man was the same Maria Alejandra Cevallos is alternating Assemblyman Nicholas Lapentti in the National Assembly? There is someone named exactly as Cevallos and Cevallos is identical to the picture that comes as the internet, judge for yourself: http://www.flickr.com/photos/asambleanacional/4690186269/ And is it a homonym? Why Molina asked what was his relationship with the campaign to collect signatures performed Carlos Vera to revoke the mandate of Rafael Correa? Why one of the spokespeople for this initiative has the same recall names of Cevallos? Is this another of the same name?
And it's not anything wrong with this young woman to do politics, but why hide it? Why journalists do not care of this newspaper to verify the information obtained? Why only question the interviewed as part of the ruling party and why there was no mention of the decree which established the state of emergency? Why instead of saying "the other truth," better not tell the whole truth? And why a newspaper rightly points out that partisan tone for ECTV Correa took over the chain incurs the same with those who are against Correa. The interview is unpresentable Cevallos anti-government propaganda newspaper with serious flaws.
0 comments:
Post a Comment